Crysis @ ultra max, is that 'better looking' game?

News, discussion, get assistance for technical problems with PC games not listed above, or share your insights.

Crysis @ ultra max, is that 'better looking' game?

Postby Blín D'ñero » 17 Feb 2008, 03:18

What is 'better looking'? Why photo-realistic? Isn't Source looking GREAT already? In the 17th century, many people thought a painting only looked magnificent if you thought you could pick the apple from it, or the guy in the portrait appeared to have real veins under his skin. Many people still have that opinion. Yet a painting can be convincing , captivating and appealing in many ways, and the most expressive painting comes closer to a drawing, wich on its turn comes closer to the mind, imagination and emotion than the 'objective' photo-realistic painting.
When gaming we're still looking at a monitor and the graphics are (digitally) painted. There is a thin line passed which the suggestion of real material gets too much attention, from the makers and players alike, both forgetting what gaming is about in the first place. When i play classic Tomb Raider (3, 4, 5) i don't feel it lacks anything visually to stay a convincing thrilling game. DX7, DX8...

Crysis is beautifull yet as a game just a classic fps that wouldn't need such superduper over the top graphics. Don't get me wrong, i like it nevertheless and it gets my 7½/10. But Dark Messiah of Might and Magic (singleplayer) which i played 60+ times i give 10/10. As someone said Arkane "reinvented the wheel". :thup:
Gaming PC: * Intel i7 4790K * Noctua NH-D15S * Asus Maximus VII Hero * 32 GB Corsair Dominator Platinum CMD32GX3M4A2133C9 * 2× Sapphire Radeon R9 290 Tri-X in crossfire * Dell U3010 @ 2560 x 1600 / 60Hz * Corsair AX 1200W * 7 x WD Black HDDs * Creative Soundblaster ZxR * Asus DRW F1ST * Corsair K95 RGB * Corsair M65 PRO RGB * Steelseries 9HD * Coolermaster STC T01 * Edifier S530 * Sennheiser HD598 * Windows 7 Ultimate x64 *

Workhorse PC: * Intel i7 2700K @ 4.8 Ghz * Noctua NH-D15 * Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z * 32 GB Corsair Vengeance Pro CMY32GX3M4A1866C9 * Sapphire HD7970 crossfire * 3 x Dell U2410 @ Eyefinity 5760 x 1200 / 60Hz * Corsair HX 1000i * 7 x WD Black HDDs * Creative Soundblaster ZxR * Optiarc AD 5240S * Steelseries 7G * Razer Imperator 2012 * Steelseries 9HD * Coolermaster STC T01 * Edifier S730D * Windows 7 Ultimate x64 *

Workhorse PC 2: * Intel i7 920 @ 3.8 Ghz * Zalman CNPS9900A LED * Asus Sabertooth x58 * 24 GB Corsair Vengeance LP 1600MHz CL9 DDR3 * Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X * Dell P4317Q * Corsair HX 850W * 7 x WDC WD1002FAEX * Creative Soundblaster Z * Optiarc AD 5240S * Steelseries 7G * Razer Mamba TE * Steelseries 9HD * Coolermaster STC T01 * Logitech Z-2300 * Windows 7 Ultimate x64 *
User avatar
Blín D'ñero
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8030
Joined: 17 Feb 2008
Location: Netherlands

Re: Crysis @ ultra max, is that 'better looking' game?

Postby Cobsy » 17 Feb 2008, 03:41

I agree on the Dark Messiah ratings, but I have to disagree on your 7 and a half/10 to Crysis.

My experience with Crysis is that it's more than a normal FPS, As you can Run forward and actually Grab your enemies and throw them away, and also the Suit options make you able to encounter the same places with different methods multiple times. I have played through the map "Assault" now about 10 times, It's my Fav. map as you have lots of space to move about on, and lots of different ways to assault the different bases spread across the map, allthough the game was "easy" to beat on hardest I would still give it a 10/10 as it's one of my 2 fav SP games :)

edit: And graphically I think the blur and lighting makes the game stunning while in the jungle and stuff, and it also has a beautiful enviroment!
Cobsy
 
Posts: 36
Joined: 17 Feb 2008


Return to Games General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron